Search Site

Repetitive Workplace Stress Injuries: Occupational Disease

Making the same motion hundreds of times a day, like striking keys on a keyboard, can result in repetitive workplace stress injuries, also known as occupational disease. In NYS, repetitive stress injuries (RSI) are known as an “occupational disease” or “occupational claim.” By either terminology, same is defined as any cumulative trauma disorder or repetitive strain injury that develops from using the same tendons and muscles in the same manner repeatedly over time, pushing those muscles and tendons beyond their capabilities

The majority of claims brought before the NYS Workers Compensation Board are based upon a specific accident/incident happening that caused injury and resulting disability. However, there are those types of claims that are not fact-specific to an event, but fact-specific to an occupation where the disability occurs slowly over the course of time due to the repetitive nature of the particular task at hand.

According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the quickest-growing type of on-the-job injury is the occupational disease. OSHA estimates that $1 in $3 spent in Workers’ Compensation benefits is directed toward workers suffering from these types of claims, and one in every four reported workplace injuries is a form of repetitive stress.

When injuries accrue slowly over time and result from seemingly mundane and low intensity tasks, employees can still suffer injury and be rendered disabled. If that happens, they are entitled to every single benefit that NYS compensation law provides to workers injured in an accidental circumstance. These are often difficult and time-consuming cases to present and prevail over. However, it can be done if one has an understanding of the facts of the case and the “law target.”

NYS case law Workers Compensation states “It is axiomatic that a claimant bears the burden of establishing a causal relationship between his or her employment and a disability by the proffer of competent medical evidence” (Matter of Williams v Colgate Univ., 54 AD3d 1121 [2008].

The medical opinion need not be expressed with absolute or reasonable certainty (Matter of Norton v North Syracuse Cent. School Dist., 59 AD3d 890 [2009]). It must, however, be an indication of sufficient probability as to the cause of the injury, and the medical opinion must be supported by a rational basis (id.). “Mere surmise, or general expressions of possibility, are not enough to support a finding of causal relationship” (Matter of Mayette v Village of Massena Fire Dept., 49 AD3d 920  [2008].

In evaluating the medical evidence presented, the Board is not bound to accept the testimony or reports of any one expert, either in whole or in part, but is free to choose those it credits and reject those it does not credit (Matter of Morrell v Onondaga County, 238 AD2d 805 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 808 [1997]; Matter of Wood v Leaseway Transp. Corp., 195 AD2d 622 [1993]).

Thus, questions of credibility, reasonableness, and relative weight to be accorded to conflicting evidence are questions of fact that come within the exclusive province of the Board (see Matter of Berkley v Irving Trust Co., 15 AD3d 750 [2005]).

In defending such cases, insurance companies will typically contend that the worker’s stress injury was present long before the employee commenced work with the employer. Carriers will also contend there is no medical evidence asserting a specific injury over time, causally related to a work task. That is to say, that there are no medical records evidencing that a distinctive feature of the claimant’s employment caused or contributed to the RSI.

RSIs can even include hearing loss, resulting from years spent working with loud machinery or in sound or music engineering. When one thinks of such claims in the eyes of an everyday worker, crystallized through the periscope of practicality and reasoning, it’s not too hard to come out at the end of the day not only understanding these cases and depth, but winning them with ease.

Practice and practicality rule the roost. RSIs come in many forms, and affect both office workers and physical laborers alike. The most commonly-reported RSI is carpal tunnel syndrome, which can arise from typing or repetitive motions with a mouse, as well as from repetitive machine work and assembly tasks. Back injuries received from years of lifting heavy boxes and objects are also common forms of RSI, and can be debilitating and career ending. Employment in a grocery store can result in RSIs. Think of it this way, if you continue to stretch out a rubber band beyond its design limits, that rubber band becomes useless.

If you have been injured on the job in NYS, and/or need assistance navigating the Workers’ Compensation, NYS Disability Retirement, or the Social Security Disability process, I would be glad to help or answer any questions. I am Peter M. Cordovano, and can be reached at 845-691-4200.

Contact us

Please fill out the form below and our attorney will contact you.

Quick Contact Form

Our Office
  • Highland Office
    1 N Roberts Road
    Highland, New York 12528
    Phone: 845-691-4200
  • Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating Badge showing Peter M. Cordovano is rated AV Preeminent
  • Client Champion Silver 2021
  • Avvo Rating Badge showing Peter M. Cordovano is rated a 9.0 Top Attorney
  • New York State Trial Lawyers Association Logo
  • Manhattan College
  • Touro Law College logo
  • Top Lawyers Peer Recognition
  • "I thank you for your attention to this matter I have received a first payment today for a two week period allotment, my notification to you via voice-mail was to keep you informed of my status. You have been excellent in all matters pertaining to my case, and I feel I'm in good hands. I’ll keep in communication in updates as I'm sure PMA will as well God Bless ..."  -–Darren P.

  • "I would like to thank you, for all you have do for me and my son. You are the most kind person and excellent lawyer I known in my life. You are our angel. For us, the way the things happened was a miracle, after all our sorrow."  -–Maria Izquierdo

  • "Peter, you can go ahead and start paperwork. I know it’s not a fair settlement, but I’m drowning. Don’t know what else to do Thank you for everything you’ve done for me. I really do appreciate you."  -–Valerie S

  • "I hope that this letter finds you in good spirits and in excellent health. I know we’ve had our difficult moments (usually due to my constant need for reassurance from you). But there isn’t a day that I don’t thank God for your levelheadedness and perseverance. Thank you."  -–Eileen

  • "Dear Peter, We can’t thank you enough for all of your help! We appreciate it more than you know! Thanks."  -–Rick, Debbie & Ricky

  • "I would like to thank you for all you have done for me and my family. You’re the best!"  -–A. Chambers

  • "Many thanks for your donation to our 2nd Annual Huskies 5K Challenge. The event was a tremendous success due in large to your generous support."  -–HMS PTA

  • "Thank you for sponsoring me to play on the Dutchess Debs. I am having lots of fun and learning a lot. I look forward to the upcoming spring season."  -–Jordan C.

  • "We are so tardy thanking you so please know we are so grateful for your time with us, prep phone calls to Bob Lackaye and follow up work on behalf of Spencer. We are resting with her anxiety about moving forward and pushing Spencer out to be a part of the workforce and world again. Believe me we are so thankful for the many miracles since the accident on July 12, 2014! Thank you for meeting us and assessing Spencer and his needs in such a caring and professional way. Your staff was friendly, caring and supportive the entire time we were in touch with your office. Many thanks for your time! Blessings to you all!"  -–D.E

  • "Dear Peter, Thank you so very much for your thoughtful and beautiful plant. Believe it or not, it will join the one you sent 5 years ago which has developed into many others too!!"  -–Fondly, Deb & Jo